Statement: The Patriot Act.
Issue: The Patriot Act
Strongly Supports: 1385
Supports: 2624
Neutral: 2088
Opposes: 2463
Strongly Opposes: 3317
Average position: 'Neutral' (based on '11877' opinions)
Passed with minimal debate only 43 days after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City, the Patriot Act dramatically expanded the authority of U.S. law enforcement agencies for the stated purpose of fighting terrorism in the United States and abroad. Among its provisions, the act increased the ability of law enforcement agencies to search telephone and e-mail communications and medical, financial, and other records; eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States; expanded the Secretary of the Treasury's authority to regulate financial transactions, particularly those involving foreign individuals and entities; and enhanced the discretion of law enforcement and immigration authorities in detaining and deporting immigrants suspected of terrorism-related acts. The act also expanded the definition of terrorism to include "domestic terrorism", thus enlarging the number of activities to which the Patriot Act's expanded law enforcement powers can be applied.
Many of the act's provisions were to sunset beginning December 31, 2005, approximately 4 years after its passage. In the months preceding the sunset date, supporters of the act pushed to make its sunsetting provisions permanent, while critics sought to revise various sections to enhance civil liberty protections. In July 2005, the U.S. Senate passed a reauthorization bill with substantial changes to several sections of the act, while the House reauthorization bill kept most of the act's original language. The two bills were then reconciled in a conference committee that was criticized by Senators from both parties for ignoring civil liberty concerns. The "compromise bill," which removed most of the changes from the Senate version, passed Congress on March 2, 2006 and was signed into law by President Bush on March 9, 2006.
Supporters of the Patriot Act argue that it makes the country safer and is crucial in preventing further terrorist attacks on our soil. It allows law enforcement agencies to cut through a lot of red tape and obtain information quickly that would have previously taken weeks to obtain, often through a warrant. It is also necessary to fight domestic terrorism. Even if it encroaches on some of our civil liberties, it is worth it to keep our country safe.
Although the Act passed by wide margins in both houses of Congress, it has been criticized from its inception for weakening protections of civil liberties. In particular, opponents of the law have criticized its authorization of indefinite detentions of immigrants; "sneak and peek" searches through which law enforcement officers search a home or business without the owner's or the occupant's permission or knowledge; the expanded use of "National Security Letters", which allow the FBI to search telephone, email, and financial records without a court order; and the expanded access of law enforcement agencies to government records, including library and financial records. Since its passage, several legal challenges have been brought against the act, and Federal courts have ruled at least one provision unconstitutional.
 |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Close Window
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||